ProductsWhistleblowing SoftwareGrievance ManagementHealth & Safety ManagementThird-Party Risk ManagementIncident Response ManagementConflict of Interest ManagementGifts & Entertainment ManagementLaw Enforcement Request Management
InsightsMediaOur story

Whistleblowing / Singapore law

Whistleblowing in Singapore: SGX rules, the Code and the Workplace Fairness Act

Singapore has no general whistleblower law. The obligations come from SGX Listing Rule 1207(18A) and (18B), the Code of Corporate Governance, the MAS Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct and the Workplace Fairness Act, which the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) aims to bring into force in end-2027. Confide is a Singapore company built by Pav Gill, who reported the Wirecard fraud from its Singapore office in 2018. The Singapore police raided Wirecard's offices there in February 2019, after the Financial Times reported the allegations. Confide is built to run the program each of those sources asks for.

“The global leaders in whistleblowing software”

As seen in:

AnthesisCelcomDigiCreadorDoctor AnywhereFairPriceFulham F.C.Fulham F.C.GrabKickShieldpayTenneT

What the law makes you have

An independent function that answers to the Audit Committee

Rule 1207(18B)(a) requires an independent function to investigate reports made in good faith, and (d) makes the Audit Committee responsible for oversight and monitoring. The NUS Centre for Investor Protection found in February 2025 that fewer than half of 536 issuers disclosed such a function. Confide gives it one case record for every report, and gives the Audit Committee what came in, what was done and how long it took.

Identity kept confidential, reporter protected from detriment

Rule 1207(18B)(b) requires the issuer to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential, and (c) to disclose its commitment to protect them against detrimental or unfair treatment. MAS expects anonymity as well for financial institutions. Confide locks anyone named in a report out of it automatically, writes every access to an immutable record, and keeps an anonymous reporter's conversation open without identifying them.

A written grievance process every employee is told about

Once in force, which MOM aims for in end-2027, the Workplace Fairness Act requires an employer to commit in writing to inquiring into each grievance about workplace discrimination or harassment, telling the employee the outcome, keeping a written record and not disclosing their identity unless reasonably necessary, and to inform every employee of the process in writing. Section 28 prohibits retaliation for raising one. Confide holds the inquiry, the outcome and the record in one case, in 30+ languages.

The requirements, and how Confide meets them

RequirementWhat the law says
Whistleblowing policy statement in the annual reportSGX 1207(18A), annual reports published from 1 Jan 2022IncludedMapped to 1207(18A) at setup
Independent function to investigate good-faith reportsSGX 1207(18B)(a)IncludedOne case record, immutable access log
Whistleblower identity kept confidentialSGX 1207(18B)(b)IncludedAnyone named locked out automatically
Disclosed commitment to protect against detrimentSGX 1207(18B)(c)IncludedWritten into the policy at kick-off
Audit Committee oversight, significant matters reported to the BoardSGX 1207(18B)(d); Code Practice Guidance 10IncludedAudit Committee reporting on every case
Anonymous reportingNot in SGX 1207(18B); MAS IAC Guidelines 5.3(iii)(d) expect it of FIsIncludedAnonymous web form, voice, QR code
Discrimination or harassment grievance inquired into, outcome given, written record keptWFA s.27(1)(a), (c), (d), once in force (MOM aims for end-2027)IncludedInquiry, outcome and record in one case
Identity of the employee who raised a grievance not disclosedWFA s.27(1)(e)IncludedRoles decide who sees a case
No retaliation for raising a grievanceWFA s.28(1); dismissal included under s.28(2)IncludedEvery access on an immutable record
Informer identity protected in corruption casesPCA s.36(1); lifted under s.36(3) for a wilfully false statementIncludedLegal hold on the case
Route to report corruption to CPIBCPIB e-complaint, email or in writing; 35 percent of 2025 reports anonymousIncludedCPIB route named in the policy
Personal data transferred outside SingaporePDPA s.26(1), comparable standard of protectionIncludedFrankfurt, ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR

See your price before the sales call.

Company size
Optional services

Why teams in Singapore choose Confide

+50%

Reports arrive ready to investigate

Rule 1207(18B)(a) requires an independent function to investigate reports made in good faith, and Echo asks its follow-up questions at intake, so 50% more reports arrive ready to investigate before that function picks them up.

1 day

Standard setup in one day

A standard setup takes one day and an enterprise rollout three to six weeks. The web form, voice report and QR code come in 30+ languages with a new one within a day, so a team spread across APAC reports in its own language from the first week.

USD 0

Nothing per user, nothing per case

One annual fee from USD 2,000 by headcount covers unlimited users and cases, so the independent function, the Audit Committee and every discrimination or harassment grievance raised under the Workplace Fairness Act sit on one system at no further cost.

Building a program the Audit Committee can sign

From a policy statement to a program the Audit Committee can put in the annual report, in the order the SGX rule, the Code and the Workplace Fairness Act ask for it.

Book a demo
  1. Kick-off with a compliance expert

    A Confide compliance expert works through which of your entities are SGX issuers, MAS-regulated financial institutions or employers within the Workplace Fairness Act, who sits on the Audit Committee, and where reports arrive today.

  2. Policy mapped to 1207(18A) and the Code

    The policy sets out the procedures for a report on misconduct or wrongdoing relating to the issuer and its officers, as 1207(18A) requires, and the arrangements Provision 10.1(f) asks the Audit Committee to review. Each clause is mapped to the part of Confide that delivers it.

  3. The independent function and the Audit Committee reporting line

    The people who investigate get roles, SSO, SCIM and MFA. Anyone named in a report is locked out of it automatically. The Audit Committee gets the report on significant matters that Practice Guidance 10 expects it to carry to the Board.

  4. Routes in every language the workforce uses

    Web form, voice report, QR code and email intake go live in the languages your people use, from 30+ with a new one within a day. Each accepts an anonymous report, as MAS expects of financial institutions, and keeps the conversation open afterwards.

  5. Test reports and the annual-report disclosure

    Run test reports through every route and follow each to closure. The annual report then explains how the issuer has complied with 1207(18B)(a) to (d) from the record, with the number of reports received, which the NUS report found 29.3 percent of issuers did not reveal.

  6. The Workplace Fairness Act grievance process before it takes effect

    The written process section 27 requires goes live before the Act takes effect, which MOM aims for in end-2027. It covers grievances about workplace discrimination or harassment: every such grievance inquired into, every employee told the outcome, a written record kept for a stated period, identity withheld unless reasonably necessary, and every employee informed of the process in writing.

Singapore whistleblowing law FAQ

Does Singapore have a whistleblower protection law?
No. There is no general whistleblower statute, and Singapore law does not require a private company to have a whistleblowing system. Protection comes in pieces. The Prevention of Corruption Act s.36 bars a witness from disclosing an informer's name or address in corruption proceedings. The Workplace Safety and Health Act s.18(2) stops an employer dismissing an employee for reporting a safety matter to an inspector in good faith. The Companies Act s.207(9A) requires a public company's auditor who has reason to believe a serious offence involving fraud or dishonesty has been committed against the company to report it to the Minister. For listed issuers the obligations come from SGX Rule 1207(18A) and (18B) and the Code of Corporate Governance; for financial institutions, from the MAS Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct; and, once in force, the Workplace Fairness Act will protect employees of employers with 25 or more staff from retaliation for raising a grievance about workplace discrimination or harassment.
What do the SGX Listing Rules require?
Mainboard Rule 1207(18A) and (18B), and Catalist Rule 1204(18A) and (18B), apply to annual reports for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2021, published from 1 January 2022. Under (18A) the annual report carries a statement that the issuer has a whistleblowing policy setting out the procedures for a whistleblower to report misconduct or wrongdoing relating to the issuer and its officers. Under (18B) it explains how the issuer has complied with four things: it has designated an independent function to investigate reports made in good faith, it keeps the identity of the whistleblower confidential, it discloses its commitment to protect the whistleblower against detrimental or unfair treatment, and the Audit Committee is responsible for oversight and monitoring. SGX RegCo said on 24 June 2021 that all issuers must establish and maintain a whistleblowing policy. The NUS Centre for Investor Protection's report of 27 February 2025, covering 536 issuers, found that 29.3 percent did not reveal the number of complaints, nearly two-thirds disclosed zero, and fewer than half disclosed an independent function to investigate them.
Does the SGX rule require anonymous reporting?
No. Rule 1207(18B) requires confidentiality of the whistleblower's identity and does not mention anonymous reports. The expectation of anonymity comes from MAS. Paragraph 5.3(iii)(d) of the Guidelines on Individual Accountability and Conduct, in force since 10 September 2021, says a financial institution should have "a formalised whistleblowing programme, including the whistleblowing channel(s) available to employees, procedures to ensure anonymity and adequate protection of employees who raise concerns". The MAS FAQ adds that the policy should offer employees anonymity and protection from negative consequences, and that the route may be run by an independent unit inside the institution, centralized at head office, or managed by a third party. CPIB's own figures show why it matters: 35 percent of the corruption reports it received in 2025 were anonymous. An issuer that accepts anonymous reports and can still ask follow-up questions meets the SGX rule and the MAS expectation at once.
What does the Workplace Fairness Act change?
It gives employees of a covered employer a grievance process for workplace discrimination and harassment, and a legal bar on retaliation. Under section 25 a grievance means a complaint about discrimination by the employer, or harassment by the employer or another employee, so the process is not a general whistleblowing route. The Act was passed on 8 January 2025, the Workplace Fairness (Dispute Resolution) Act on 4 November 2025, and the Ministry of Manpower aims for it to take effect in end-2027. Section 27(1) requires the employer to commit in writing to inquiring into each grievance, informing the employee of the outcome, keeping a written record for a stated period, and not disclosing the employee's identity unless reasonably necessary, and section 27(2) requires every employee to be told the process in writing. Section 28 prohibits any retaliatory act against an employee because they raised a grievance, brought proceedings, gave evidence or information, or alleged a contravention, and section 28(2) names dismissal as one. Section 31 sets administrative penalties per contravention, including each occasion of retaliation and the failure to develop the section 27 process, and section 34 civil penalties for serious contraventions. Under section 4 the Act does not apply to employers with fewer than 25 employees, or another number the Minister prescribes.
Where can a report be made outside the company?
It depends on the wrongdoing. Corruption goes to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau, by e-complaint, by email or in writing to its office. CPIB received 160 corruption-related reports in 2025, registered 68 as new cases, and prosecuted 90 individuals, 94 percent of them from the private sector. Misconduct at a listed issuer can go to the SGX RegCo Whistleblowing Office, set up in January 2020 to receive reports in confidence. Regulatory breaches or misconduct at a financial institution go to MAS through its online form, which asks for a name and email. A cartel participant who is first to notify the Competition and Consumer Commission may receive immunity from financial penalties if no investigation has begun and it meets the leniency conditions, including full cooperation and ending its part in the cartel. A safety matter can be reported to a Workplace Safety and Health inspector, and the Workplace Safety and Health Act protects the employee who does so in good faith. None of these routes replaces the internal one the SGX rule and the Code require.
What did Wirecard change in Singapore?
Less than the case suggests. The Commercial Affairs Department raided Wirecard's Singapore entities on 8 February 2019, nine days after the Financial Times published its first report on 30 January. MAS directed Wirecard SG on 30 September 2020 to cease its payment services and return all customer funds by 14 October 2020. In June 2023 James Aga Wardhana and Chai Ai Lim were convicted of criminal breach of trust and related offences and sentenced to 21 and 10 months, and Henry Yeo Chiew Hai to 12 months, while Edo Kurniawan remains at large under an INTERPOL Red Notice. The same month MAS imposed SGD 3.8 million in composition penalties on Citibank, DBS, OCBC and Swiss Life for anti-money laundering breaches linked to Wirecard. R. Shanmugaratnam of Citadelle Corporate Services was convicted on 22 September 2025 on 13 charges of falsifying balance confirmation letters claiming the firm held over EUR 1.1 billion, and sentenced on 6 January 2026 to ten years; James Henry O'Sullivan received six and a half years; both are appealing. In October 2023 Abdul Jabbar of Rajah & Tann told CNA that the current patchwork of legislation was inadequate and that one clear law giving comprehensive protection would help, and Mak Yuen Teen said wrongdoing goes undiscovered because of the lack of whistleblower protection. No whistleblower statute has been passed.

Built in Singapore, for the rule book

GrabFairPriceTenneTShieldpay
Pick a time on the calendar